November 6th, 2013
This mornings headlines read:
NO MORE SCHOOL BUSES. The Referendum Failed. That means they are not going to be raising our taxes. Now it is up to MCS to find another way.
November 7th, 2013
This morning the headlines read:
MIXED MESSAGES. Mayor Tyer disappointed but moving on. MCS is waiting on an answer to their request for a waiver.
November 10th, 2013
This mornings headlines read:
WAITING ON A WAIVER. A Law that was passed in 2012 requiring Indiana school districts to give a three-year notice if they plan to end transportation services, allows districts to apply for a waiver to eliminate the waiting period. Muncie Community Schools applied for a waiver with the Department of Education earlier this year and was told by the IDOE that it would delay action until after the referendum.
Chris Hiatt · Top Commenter · Muncie Central High School Here's their 4-sentence "backup plan"...(tell me again how much we pay these knuckleheads?)
"The only mandated transportation would be per the federal Title VII-B
McKinney-Vento Homelss (Student) Assistance Act as amended by the No
Child Left Behind Act of 2001"
"The Muncie Community Schools is
a one-township (36 square miles) district with nine (9) neighborhood
elementary schools evenly located throughout the corporation."
"No elementary child is further than two (2) miles from their closest school."
"Secondary students have free/no fee access to buses of the Muncie Indiana Transit System (MITS)."
DAVID MCINTOSH
Muncie
There
is confusion regarding whether the Muncie Community Schools
administration has a wavier or has requested a waiver. After a recent
call to the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE), here are the facts
regarding the waiver:
1. MCS has requested a waiver from the IDOE. This was confirmed by visiting with an official within the IDOE.
2.
MCS has submitted a waiver to the IDOE requesting that the three-year
notice that schools must provide prior to discontinuing transportation
services be waived.
3. According to the IDOE the request is on hold pending the outcome of the vote on the referendum.
4.
The IDOE has indicated that a public hearing will occur prior to
determining whether to grant or deny the waiver request. This hearing
would occur in November. The public will be able to attend this meeting.
5. The IDOE will conduct the public hearing within the MCS district.
6.
If the waiver were denied, MCS would be required to provide
transportation for the next three years. However, MCS could notify the
IDOE that they will utilize the option of notifying patrons that they
plan to discontinue bus service after three years.
7.
One other school district in Indiana has notified the IDOE that they
will utilize the option of notifying patrons that they plan to
discontinue bus service after three years.
8. Of the all the school districts in Indiana, MCS will be one of two that has requested a waiver to date.
Larry Riley wrote:
As I write this, polls in yesterday’s Muncie Community Schools
referendum remain open. Results are on page 1 and I presume you’ve read
the outcome.
Sunday I wrote that the odds
were even up, a toss-up between fearful parents getting told they’ll
lose bus service for their kids and exasperated taxpayers at wit’s end
with local government’s ever-rising costs.
I think the latter may out-vote the former and that will produce the most interest to me.
MCS
officials insist that bus service will be terminated with the
referendum’s failure to pass, starting with the 2014-15 school year.
Busing
became an issue statewide last year after an Indianapolis school
district, Franklin Township, went through several years trying to get
more money than property tax caps allowed.
Franklin school officials tried not one, but two referendums for more money, both failing at the ballot box.
Franklin’s financial problems were similar to Muncie’s in that a ton of debt had to be paid off.
The
problems were way dissimilar in that Franklin saw a fast-rising school
enrollment, going from 6,400 students in 2001 up to more than 9,000 by
2011. The district hastily built more schools and took on lots of debt.
This
is in direct contrast to Muncie Community Schools, which during the
same period of time saw almost a complete reversal of Franklin as far as
enrollment went, dropping from perhaps 9,000 down to 6,700.
Nevertheless, school board members decided to spend $55 million to
upgrade facilities and take on lots of debt in the middle of the
shrinkage.
(Yes, one has to wonder if those school board members learned their critical thinking skills in Muncie school classrooms.)
I
actually think that until the Franklin standoffs occurred and officials
at that school looked into every option, nobody realized that Indiana
didn’t require schools to provide transportation to and from school for
students.
But
Franklin saw an out, and in its final referendum attempt warned parents
(and voters) that transportation would end if taxes weren’t raised
because, indeed, state law did not require school to provide
transportation. (Federal law requires certain students with special
needs to be transported, so officials confirmed some busing would
continue.)
When the referendum failed, Franklin sold its buses to a private
firm, who took over transportation, and parents were charged a fee if
their kids needed bused. Legislators last year put an end to the
practice of charging parents for busing.
Some
parents sued Franklin schools, but I think the suit was dropped when
Franklin schools restructured debt to free up money for transportation
(imagine that) for the 2012-13 school year and going forward.
State
legislators also weighed in the importance of school transportation by
requiring any elimination of the service to be announced three years in
advance. Schools were given a possible out by a provision allowing
distressed districts to petition for a waiver from the three-year
period.
Muncie
school officials said they applied for the waiver, and initially led the
public to believe they received an OK from the Indiana Department of
Education. Later, under more questioning, they clarified that the state
had not approved the application after all, but was waiting for the
referendum before acting on the petition.
Perhaps this will be moot now, depending on yesterday’s outcome.
Still,
I’d like to see the petition that MCS filed with the state, because the
school system should, by law, have included a plan with the petition.
Namely,
“a written plan that provides for the safe movement of eligible
students to and from school.” And “eligible students” is defined in the
law as any individual enrolled and attending school and
not required by federal or other state law to receive transportation services.
That’s
fascinating. So MCS had — in theory, at least — to develop a plan for
how kids would safely get to and from school without the school
providing bus transportation.
Wonder
what the plan says. If the referendum failed, the state’s DOE will
conduct a public hearing, somewhere in the district, on the petition to
end transportation. If the referendum passes, I guess the petition will
be withdrawn and no public hearing held.
I’d still like to know what the plan was.
Larry Riley teaches English at Ball State University. Email him at lriley@bsu.edu.
Fran Tucker · Top Commenter · Indianapolis, Indiana
Another
thing that is upsetting is the constant claim that disabled children
won't have busing. Right in the waiver MCS states it must abide by
Federal Law. I knew that to be true, but MCS, to my knowledge, never
clairifed that and the Yes supporters continued to tell people that,
with no regard to parents and citizens getting upset. That's wrong,
folks to play on fears....