10/30/2013

Good Information

Just FYI: To figure the impact take assessed value after subtracting any exemptions. Divide that by 100 and then multiply by .3939 (the rate in the referendum question). 
 
Chris made it simple for me.  For every 100K of non-homesteaded property it will be $393 ($400 approximately).  So every business or real estate portfolio of $1 million will incur almost $4,000 more a year.  On top of all the Property Tax already billed.  Several of your members have portfolios that size and that's another motive for Delaware Co to keep climbing assessments.
 
Let me know what you suggest.
 
Victoria

10/21/2013

Need Help filing a Property Tax Appeal?



Two dates - Two times!!
This Wednesday @ 6:00 pm!!
This Saturday @ 8:00 am!!

 Property Tax Appeasl Help Day FREE!!!




At the Kennedy Branch Library, McGalliard Road, Muncie.

The new General Reassessment Assessed Values are done and have been mailed!
(If you own property and haven't seen yours, you better call the County Assessor's office @ (765) 747-7715 and research your new assessment IMMEDIATELY!)

The deadline to appeal your Property Tax Assessment is October 31, 2013!!

Many have seen increases of over 50% in their assessed values!!

The law now provides for the Assessor to bear the burden of proof on any assessment that has increased more than 5%, but YOU MUST FILE AN APPEAL for that review to occur!

The Citizens of Delaware County for Good Government is hosting our Fifth Annual “Property Tax Appeal Help Day” on both Wednesday October 23, 2013 and Saturday October 26, 2013 at the Kennedy Library on McGalliard Road.  There is no cost for this service, however last year we PACKED THE HOUSE with well over nearly 200 taxpayers in attendence, so be sure and be on time and prepared!
The purpose of the Property Tax Appeal Help Day is to help property owners who believe that their assessed values are too high.   We will provide a packet with pointers on how to complete your property tax assessment appeal forms, but we do not guarantee that you will win your appeal.    
The following “Tax Appeal Primer” contains preliminary information to help you file your property tax appeal. 
·         You snooze, you lose:  Property owners have until October 31, 2013 to appeal assessed values on their properties.  If you fail to appeal by the deadline, you will lose your right to appeal.  You can provide additional information for your appeal after it is filed, but you must file before the deadline.
·         No news isn’t always good news:  We were advised that the Form 11, which shows changes in assessed values, is being sent to all property owners this year.  If you have not received a Form 11 for your property you should check with the Assessor’s Office to determine if your assessed values have changed.  
·         Appeal with Zeal:  Be advised that you may need to appeal your assessment this year, even if you appealed and won last year. We are aware of properties with assessed values that were reduced last year per successful appeals that reverted back to pre-appeal levels this year.  The good news is that State Senator Doug Eckerty is working with Representative Bill Davis on legislation to close the loophole that allows County Assessors to “trend” your assessed value from the pre-appeal amount versus the adjusted amount that resulted from a successful appeal.   So if you win your appeal, future assessed values should be trended from adjusted assessed value that is a result of your appeal. 
·         Home sweet homestead: A homestead exemption can save homeowners money on their property taxes.  House Enrolled Act ("HEA") 1344-2009, required the homestead exemption form be mailed with all property tax statements through 2012 though it must only be completed once prior to Jan. 1, 2013.  We recommend that you re-file your homestead exemption this year to make sure that it gets done. 
·         Don’t leave home without it (A Property Record Card that is):  Be sure to pick up a current Property Record Card from the Assessor’s office so that you can identify errors on your assessment.  Call the Assessor’s Office at 747-7710 for help.  They can email your Property Record Card to you.
·         A picture is worth a thousand words:  Provide photographs of any damages or other issues that detract from the value of the property. Take photographs of the inside and outside of the property as needed.
·         Condition and Grade matter:  These ratings affect your assessed values. The Department of Local Government Finance has provided guidelines that can be used to validate the condition and grade of your property
·         Two copies are better than one: Make two copies of your appeal and all photographs and supporting documentation and have them date stamped when you turn in your appeal.  Make sure you keep a complete copy of all documentation for your records
Be sure to mark your calendars for either Wednesday, October 23rd or Saturday, October 26th at the Kennedy Library on McGalliard Road.
We hope to see you there!

10/07/2013

Larry Riley Star Press 10/6/2013

In the last week, I’ve run into two people who have told me similar stories about discussions they’ve had with friends of theirs whom they know to be intelligent. They and their friends were talking about the upcoming referendum over raising Muncie Community Schools taxes. On Nov. 5, voters in Center Township will be eligible to cast a ballot either opposing or supporting increasing property taxes by 39.39 cents per $100 of assessed value of the property they own. Each person said their friends, after talking over the issue, made a statement similar to this: “Well, if the referendum passes, it won’t matter to me because our property tax already is at the property tax cap.” Way wrong response. We wouldn’t be having a referendum unless a pro-hike outcome was going to take local property taxes in Center Township the tax caps, and levy additional taxes. If you’re at the property tax cap, which 65.5 percent of homesteaded property owners in Center Township are (homesteaded property are homes in which the homeowner lives in the home), you’ll keep paying the maximum allowed by the caps and pay additional taxes WHAT ABOUT THE “AVERAGE” increase Muncie Community Schools officials keep talking about? School folks are fond of saying the “average” home in the school district is assessed at $75,000 and the owners will pay an additional $65 annually in taxes with rate hike approval. The mean assessed value of a homesteaded property in Center Township is actually $69,135, but the net assessed value on which property taxes are paid, thanks to a really generous homestead exemption, drops to $20,200. On this NAV, the additional taxes MCS wants would be $80 per year. More than one-third of all properties by parcel in the township are homesteaded. But what about the “average” non-homesteaded property, where people rent the homes they live in? Another 26 percent of property parcels in the township are in this category. The “average” property in this category is assessed at $57,102, and because those property owners get far fewer exemptions, the NAV average is $56,965. The annual increase on these property owners would be $224. If the owners don’t absorb any of the increase, average rent would increase by that much, about $20 a month. If owners are willing, say, to split the difference, rents would go up $112 per year. The highest property tax-paying category is commercial/industrial property, and the “average” assessment for these owners is $108,000. This is a little deceiving, though, because the range is really large: from a few hundred dollars up to the Muncie Mall’s $22 million value. How about a specific example? Lowe’s Home Center off Clara Lane on Muncie’s northwest side, is almost exactly 1 percent of the total commercial/industrial property assessment total. The company enjoyed a terrific second quarter of the year, with sales up 10.3 percent over the second quarter of 2012. If the referendum passes, Lowe’s will pay $33,721 in additional taxes. Say the home center has a 10 percent margin (could be optimistic). To pay the additional taxes will require $337,000 in additional sales. Given how well the year’s going, people might think, good, they can easily afford more taxes. Yet if the national chain wants to continue profit levels it currently runs, the layoffs of three part-time workers may be a better option than trying to sell one-third of a million more dollars worth of goods. Center Township has more than 8,000 parcels of commercial/industrial properties, but 93 percent of the assessed value is in 1,400 parcels, and all those are at the property tax cap maximum. WHO’S BEHIND THE “Vote Yes” and “Vote No” signs? That’s just what the Delaware County Election Board wants to know, though particularly about the former. The latter, unlike the former, has no single entity which will be advantaged by referendum defeat. The one entity with a big stake came up at last week’s Election Board meeting. Semi-retired local real estate agent and former Buick car dealership owner Brad Razor attended the meeting to inquire about the “Vote Yes” signs popping up around town, including on Muncie school properties. The rumor is that M&M bus company is doing it,” Razor told the board, “but I can’t imagine they’d be doing it without the blessing of the school system.” The MCS board has decided that if voters don’t approve increasing school taxes, they will eliminate bus transportation for students, and the system pays M&M to operate the bus service. Razor, a former Republican County Council member who has penned several letters to the editor opposing the referendum, said he could find no Political Action Committee filing of any group behind the effort, either. Anyone spending more than $100 to promote an election question would trigger a need to do so under existing law. Under a newer law that took effect last year, a vendor who contracts with a school corporation may not spend any money to promote the outcome. The Election Board agreed to send Muncie Community Schools officials, including the board president, a letter asking if they know who’s behind the signage, and given time constraints, members want an answer this week. Larry Riley teaches English at Ball State University. Email him at:lriley@bsu.edu

9/10/2013

More information about VOTE NO!


Please help defeat the MCS Referendum in November!
Most importantly, be sure to VOTE! (A list of the Voting Centers is attached)
By now, most should be aware that both the Muncie Community School Administration and now apparently the League of Women Voters are promoting the Muncie Community School Referendum to raise the MCS Bus Fund levy by 267% with fallacious fear mongering.

The voters need to be informed with the facts.

MCS currently has a current Bus levy that produces 33% more revenue as what they currently pay for their bus transportation. MCS receives $3.7 million per year in local property taxes for the transportation fund and pays about $2.5 million per year for bus transportation. A $1.2 million surplus. They now want to raise that tax revenue to over $9.5 million per year under the threat of the safety and welfare of your children......that is simply despicable.

The "minimal tax amounts" to the taxpayers that the Muncie Community Schools are exhalting in support of their efforts to add this additional tax will ONLY apply to RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY OWNERS and utilizing all available deductions which, in actuality represents only a very small number of the Muncie Community School households.

Both the MCS Administration and the League of Women Voters are trying to augment their postures and arguments in support of the tax increase on the basis that we have an extremely high poverty rate in the MCS district and that nearly 75% of the children attending MCS are on free or reduced lunches. It's EXTREMELY IMPORTANT to recognize that the majority of those poverty-stricken and low-income families DO NOT OWN the homes that they reside in and will, in fact, be most negatively impacted by the tax increase! The taxes on the homes that they occupy and pay rent on will increase between $200 and $400 annually ($1,400.00 to $2,800.00 over the course of the tax period) and most assuredly that additional cost will be passed on to them by way of increased rents. So, if you're a residential homeowner protected by those precious cost-saving deductions and are inclined to vote in favor of the Referendum because the cost to you is minimal, then just be reminded that you do so at the expense of the most vulnerable in our community!

What Muncie Community Schools is really doing with this additional tax referendum is making one last-ditch effort to pick the pockets of the local taxpayers in lieu of making the tougher decisions regarding consolidations and cost cutting that they should have done years ago. They are blaming the property tax caps for their problems, yet the tax caps have been implements for over 4 years! If the Muncie Community Schools can't come to terms with their bloated budget after 4 years of tax caps, then they certainly shouldn't be rewarded with additional tax revenues. There's good reason why the Muncie Community Schools don't want to make any tough decisions regarding school closings and consolidations BEFORE the election. They want YOU to bail them out!
Over the course of the years, and directly in the face of over 12,000 good paying jobs leaving our community and the declining enrollment of their school corporation to the extent that it is only about 1/3 of what it was at its peak, MCS has continued to pour nearly $100 million in total costs associated with sustaining the status quo. Now the chickens have come home to roost and it's not the taxpayers fault, nor the taxpayer’s responsibility to bail them out.
Voters beware and don't let anybody fool you, if this Referendum fails as it rightfully should, and the Muncie Community Schools moves forward with suspending bus transportation for our children, it's not because the money isn't there. It's because they feel that there are more important things like Administrator's pay and benefits as well as keeping half-filled schools open rather than bus your children to and from their school. That decision, if it occurs, would be reprehensible.

9/09/2013

Tax Sale

I was able to go to the training seminar that was done at the City Hall Building. We were told it was being filmed and is now showing on channel 60. If you have any interest in buying a tax sale property now or in the future, here is a chance to learn at the time and before the sale. I will be at the sale also. Go with me.

In today's paper there was an article from Larry Riley on his view of the tax sale and the seminar.

Larry Riley: Navigating tax sales takes time, expertise

 A of couple times over the last few weeks a special 10-page supplement has been included in The Star Press, most recently last Wednesday: the 2013 Delaware County tax sale notice, featuring 1,930 properties.

Owners of these properties are behind in their property taxes by at least three payments (taxes are due twice a year, May and November) and at that point are subject to getting auctioned off in the tax sale.
Owners can pay up and remove the property from the sale anytime up to, I think, the day before the Oct. 1 sale, and people pour into the county Treasurer’s office doing so continually.

Owners can pay up and remove the property from the sale anytime up to, I think, the day before the Oct. 1 sale, and people pour into the county Treasurer’s office doing so continually.

By late last week, the number of properties still scheduled for the block were down to 1,689.
(Owners have to pay both back taxes and a late penalty of 10 percent, though some people who scam the system know they need only pay the oldest of the three payments in arrears. They still owe a bundle, but their property gets pulled from sale.)
I’m sure state law specifies the format of the legal publication — the aforementioned 10-page insert — but the notice is almost worthless to anyone interested in what’s for sale.
Each property starts with its obscure parcel identification, a series of 9 digits followed by another series of 18 digits, then the amount of arrearage, owners’ names, and then property address.
A reader would have to know how the parcel ID system arranges addresses in the county, find that general area in the 10 pages, and then plod through listing after listing if they wanted to see whether a particular property was in the sale.
Regardless, I’m happy the county shells out some of the fewer and fewer dollars it has to pay for the insert.
Yet you do have to research much more if you’re interested in actually bidding on properties, and a lot of businesses, both locally and nationwide, do so. Buying tax sale properties has become a cottage industry, and more, these days.
In part, this is because a buyer is not really purchasing the property, but buys a certificate giving them the right to take title after a one-year period of time in which the original owner can redeem the property by paying the original taxes and penalties.
 Along with the redemption, however, comes an additional 10 percent interest fee for the first few months that lapse followed by a 15 percent fee for remaining months, on the amount the successful buyer bid.
For example, one of the best properties still scheduled in the Oct. 1 sale from the standpoint of value minus tax owed is the Temple Baptist Church, on South Madison at 29th Street.
The church owes $2,276, an amount that rises to $2,888 on auction day, and this will be the minimum bid to buy the property. The land and 14,000-square-foot building are assessed at $466,000.
One has to believe the congregation will quickly redeem the property were it sold at auction, and thus if the winning bid were, say, $50,000, whoever bought the property would be owed $5,000 immediately. Nice ROI.
This is also an example of a property highly likely to be removed from the sale in the next few weeks. If you’re wondering why a religious property would be owing taxes, the answer is that stormwater fees, which everybody pays, are collected on tax bills and make properties subject to sale if unpaid.
The Tyler administration is trying to expand the fraternity of local people who bid in the tax sale to include prospective homeowners: people willing to invest, take the property, fix the place up and move in.
Scores of distressed properties are included in every tax sale, perhaps even the majority of one-family houses for sale.
If one knows what they’re doing, though, you can get a good deal and wind up owning valuable property for much less than what you’d pay going through the normal process of home buying.
Last week, Muncie’s Community Development office offered a 90-minute workshop attended by about 50 people on the rudiments of bidding on property and taking certificates to deed.
One piece of misinformation got passed on by the SRI Inc. representative who made the presentation (SRI is a private business that handles the county’s tax sales), namely that purchasers of tax sale property have no right to trespass on the property during the one-year redemption period.
 State law changed in 2011. While no one can enter a building, law now does allow a non-owner of a property that’s vacant or abandoned to “secure” the property, mow the grounds, remove trash and debris, and remove graffiti, and they’re immune from prosecution or civil lawsuit.
Perhaps this can be clarified before the auction.
The process remains daunting. Of the 1,689 parcels still scheduled for sale late last week, 235 are under water vis-à-vis taxes. That is, those properties owe more taxes than the property is assessed.
In some cases, as the back taxes mounted up, the house on the property became so dilapidated the city tore the place down.
For example, the Indianapolis owner of 306 E. Gilbert St., a neighborhood near downtown, owes $39,000 on a lot worth $5,400.
In other cases, modest-sized houses have accrued arrearages beyond their worth: a four-bedroom house at 2400 S. Walnut St., assessed at $17,300 owes $20,000 in taxes.
Bargains can await, but caveat emptor.
Larry Riley teaches English at Ball State University. Email him at at lriley@bsu.edu.

National Tenant Network

Here is more information I received today from NTN's Newletter. Don't forget that John will be at our meeting on the 19th of this month. He will be explaining the program and answering any and all of your questions. Plan on being there and bring a friend that is also a landlord.

FAIR HOUSING LAWS

Fair housing laws are in place to prevent discrimination in housing transactions, including sale, rental or financing of property. The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status and disability. Should you violate these laws as a landlord, whether intentionally or accidently, you may be sued in Federal Court and ordered to pay actual and punitive damages, as well as attorney's fees and costs. NTN solves this problem for our subscribers with NTN DecisionPoint. For consistent, documented tenant selection, this is the report that will simplify your leasing process.

READ MORE ABOUT NTN DECISIONPOINT 


NTN DecisionPoint reviews an applicant's background and produces an overall score, much like a credit score, along with a corresponding rental recommendation - both of which are based on a thorough and objective analysis of both the applicant's credit record and his or her history of eviction(s) and/or lease violation(s). NTN DecisionPoint also takes into account longevity of employment and longevity of residence, thereby ensuring a higher probability of overall resident retention. In addition, the NTN DecisionPoint report is accompanied by a comprehensive NTN
tenant-performance profile, a detailed eviction and lease violation history, screening history,
landlord identification and terrorist search.

To see a sample NTN DecisionPoint report, CLICK HERE.

STRONG RENTAL MARKET CONTINUES 
  
There are enough impediments to homeownership, experts argue, to keep the rental market strong for the immediate future, including a still-recovering jobs market, increasingly stringent mortgage requirements, and a sizable swath of the home-buyer base that is still reeling from the effects of the housing market downturn, with underwater or delinquent mortgages. Plus, the nation's two largest generational groups-the baby boomers, who are at or near retirement age, and the Millennials, most of whom are in the very early stages of their career, are ripe for long-term rentals.